Archive : Volume - 8, Issue - 12, Month - December
1 REMOVABLE OVERDENTURE VERSUS FIXED BRIDGE FABRICATED ON ALL-ON-4 IMPLANTS USING CAD/CAM TECHNOLOGY (STRAIN GAUGE ANALYSIS)
- Karim Elnabarawy* ,
- Ahmed Emad Eldin Edamarisy ,
- Marwa Kothayer Abdel-Hakeem ,
- Fardos Nabil Rizk ,
- Marwa Ezzat Sabet
- Abstract
- Show Article
- Download : 368
- Google Citation
- Journal DOI : 10.46624/BJMHR.2021.V8.I12.004
- Certificate
Abstract : Statement of the problem. Assessing the effects on maxilla when using fixed vs. removable prosthesis on All-On-4® protocol.
This in-vitro study was conducted to compare stresses induced on distal implants in the All-On-4® concept between digitally constructed removable overdenture and fixed bridge, using strain gauge analysis.
Four dummy implants were placed in their designed locations according to the All-On-4® concept; in a 3D printed completely edentulous maxillary acrylic cast. Multiunit abutments were secured to the implants.
Two groups were defined: Group A: The framework was cemented to the four titanium copings over the implants (Fixed bridge). Group B: The same framework was picked up after relief was done and then seated on the ball attachments (Removable overdenture). Stresses were measured using strain gauges installed in their designed sites in the 3D printed cast. Loads of 100N were applied in a vertical and oblique direction on the right molar area.
Paired t-test was used to compare between two different load directions within the same group, and unpaired t-test was used to compare between different groups. P-value ≤ 0.05 was statistically significant. Group A with vertical loads (532±9.2) and oblique loads (464±40.3) showed significantly higher stresses on the supporting structures of the distal implants than group B with vertical loads (64 ±7.75) and oblique loads (41.5±2.42).
Within group A, higher microstrains were recorded on the distal implants in the loaded side in case of applying vertical loads (532±9.2) than in the case of oblique loads (464±40.3). Also, lower microstrains were recorded in the unloaded side in the case of vertical loads (21.5±2.42) than in oblique loads (43±2.58).
Within group B, higher microstrains were recorded in the loaded side in case of applying vertical loads (64±7.75), than in case of oblique loads (41.5±2.42). Also, lower microstrains were recorded in the unloaded side in case of vertical loads (10.5±1.58) than in case of oblique loads (18.5±2.42).
Within the limitations of this study, it could be concluded that the distal implants in the fixed bridge suffered higher loads than the removable overdenture.
Keyword : All-on-4 protocol, digitally constructed prostheses, Polyetheretherketone and strain gauge.
Login
Loading....
Author Guideline
Copyright Form
News Update
Archive List
- Volume-11
- January 2024 Issue 1
- February 2024 Issue 2
- February 2024 Issue 2
- March 2024 Issue 3
- April 2024 Issue 4
- May 2024 Issue 5
- May 2024 Issue 5
- June 2024 Issue 6
- July 2024 Issue 7
- July 2024 Issue 7
- August 2024 Issue 8
- September 2024 Issue 9
- September 2024 Issue 9
- October 2024 Issue 10
- November 2024 Issue 11
- December 2024 Issue 12
- Volume-10
- January 2023 Issue 1
- January 2023 Issue 1
- February 2023 Issue 2
- March 2023 Issue 3
- March 2023 Issue 3
- April 2023 Issue 4
- April 2023 Issue 4
- May 2023 Issue 5
- May 2023 Issue 5
- May 2023 Issue 5
- June 2023 Issue 6
- June 2023 Issue 6
- July 2023 Issue 7
- July 2023 Issue 7
- August 2023 Issue 8
- August 2023 Issue 8
- September 2023 Issue 9
- October 2023 Issue 10
- November 2023 Issue 11
- December 2023 Issue 12
- Volume-9
- January 2022 Issue 1
- February 2022 Issue 2
- March 2022 Issue 3
- April 2022 Issue 4
- May 2022 Issue 5
- June 2022 Issue 6
- July 2022 Issue 7
- July 2022 Issue 7
- July 2022 Issue 7
- July 2022 Issue 7
- August 2022 Issue 8
- September 2022 Issue 9
- October 2022 Issue 10
- October 2022 Issue 10
- November 2022 Issue 11
- November 2022 Issue 11
- November 2022 Issue 11
- December 2022 Issue 12
- Volume-8
- January 2021 Issue 1
- February 2021 Issue 2
- February 2021 Issue 2
- March 2021 Issue 3
- April 2021 Issue 4
- May 2021 Issue 5
- June 2021 Issue 6
- June 2021 Issue 6
- June 2021 Issue 6
- July 2021 Issue 7
- August 2021 Issue 8
- September 2021 Issue 9
- October 2021 Issue 10
- November 2021 Issue 11
- December 2021 Issue 12
- Volume-7
- January 2020 Issue 1
- January 2020 Issue 1
- February 2020 Issue 2
- March 2020 Issue 3
- March 2020 Issue 3
- March 2020 Issue 3
- April 2020 Issue 4
- April 2020 Issue 4
- May 2020 Issue 5
- May 2020 Issue 5
- May 2020 Issue 5
- June 2020 Issue 6
- June 2020 Issue 6
- June 2020 Issue 6
- July 2020 Issue 7
- August 2020 Issue 8
- September 2020 Issue 9
- October 2020 Issue 10
- November 2020 Issue 11
- December 2020 Issue 12
- December 2020 Issue 12
- Volume-6
- January 2019 Issue 1
- February 2019 Issue 2
- March 2019 Issue 3
- April 2019 Issue 4
- April 2019 Issue 4
- May 2019 Issue 5
- May 2019 Issue 5
- June 2019 Issue 6
- June 2019 Issue 6
- July 2019 Issue 7
- July 2019 Issue 7
- August 2019 Issue 8
- September 2019 Issue 9
- September 2019 Issue 9
- September 2019 Issue 9
- October 2019 Issue 10
- November 2019 Issue 11
- November 2019 Issue 11
- November 2019 Issue 11
- December 2019 Issue 12
- Volume-5
- January 2018 Issue 1
- January 2018 Issue 1
- February 2018 Issue 2
- March 2018 Issue 3
- April 2018 Issue 4
- May 2018 Issue 5
- June 2018 Issue 6
- July 2018 Issue 7
- August 2018 Issue 8
- September 2018 Issue 9
- September 2018 Issue 9
- October 2018 Issue 10
- October 2018 Issue 10
- November 2018 Issue 11
- December 2018 Issue 12
- December 2018 Issue 12
- Volume-4
- January 2017 Issue 1
- February 2017 Issue 2
- February 2017 Issue 2
- March 2017 Issue 3
- April 2017 Issue 4
- April 2017 Issue 4
- May 2017 Issue 5
- June 2017 Issue 6
- June 2017 Issue 6
- June 2017 Issue 6
- June 2017 Issue 6
- July 2017 Issue 7
- August 2017 Issue 8
- August 2017 Issue 8
- September 2017 Issue 9
- October 2017 Issue 10
- November 2017 Issue 11
- December 2017 Issue 12
- December 2017 Issue 12
- December 2017 Issue 12
- Volume-3
- January 2016 Issue 1
- February 2016 Issue 2
- March 2016 Issue 3
- April 2016 Issue 4
- May 2016 Issue 5
- June 2016 Issue 6
- June 2016 Issue 6
- July 2016 Issue 7
- July 2016 Issue 7
- July 2016 Issue 7
- August 2016 Issue 8
- September 2016 Issue 9
- October 2016 Issue 10
- October 2016 Issue 10
- November 2016 Issue 11
- November 2016 Issue 11
- December 2016 Issue 12
- Volume-2
- Volume-1
Statastics
Download of Articles
190,475